Hazen v. Smith

Supreme Court of Vermont

Hazen v. Smith

1 Tyl. 105

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hazen v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Tyl. 59 →

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1801·Published

Opinion

Opinion of the Court.

The'Chief Judge delivered the opinion of the Court,

The Court consider, that the Justice of the Peace had no power, under the statute of 1787, on motion for new bail, to take the recognisance declared upon. The second exception in demurrer being well taken, in the united opinion of the Judges, and going to the cause of action, the Court waive any opinion .upon the other points.

Let judgment be entered, that the plaintiffs’ declaration is insufficient, and that defendants have their costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court.

The'Chief Judge delivered the opinion of the Court,

The Court consider, that the Justice of the Peace had no power, under the statute of 1787, on motion for new bail, to take the recognisance declared upon. The second exception in demurrer being well taken, in the united opinion of the Judges, and going to the cause of action, the Court waive any opinion .upon the other points.

Let judgment be entered, that the plaintiffs’ declaration is insufficient, and that defendants have their costs,

Hazen v. Smith, 1 Tyl. 105 (Vt. 1801).

Pincite

1 Tyl. 105 (Hazen v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.