Hazen v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Hazen v. Smith

120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 249

DecidedFebruary 20, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 334 (Hazen v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazen v. Smith, 120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 249 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A demurrer having been filed to the petition for writ of prohibition herein, and the court having considered the record together with briefs filed by the attorneys for the respective parties, it appears that the de *250 murrer to the petition should be sustained and the proceedings dismissed under authority of the opinion in the case of State ex rel. The Bank of America v. Rowe, filed July 19th, 1928, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A demurrer having been filed to the petition for writ of prohibition herein, and the court having considered the record together with briefs filed by the attorneys for the respective parties, it appears that the de *250 murrer to the petition should be sustained and the proceedings dismissed under authority of the opinion in the case of State ex rel. The Bank of America v. Rowe, filed July 19th, 1928, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazen-v-smith-fla-1929.