Hazen v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Hazen v. Smith

120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 249

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 20, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A demurrer having been filed to the petition for writ of prohibition herein, and the court having considered the record together with briefs filed by the attorneys for the respective parties, it appears that the de *250 murrer to the petition should be sustained and the proceedings dismissed under authority of the opinion in the case of State ex rel. The Bank of America v. Rowe, filed July 19th, 1928, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A demurrer having been filed to the petition for writ of prohibition herein, and the court having considered the record together with briefs filed by the attorneys for the respective parties, it appears that the de *250 murrer to the petition should be sustained and the proceedings dismissed under authority of the opinion in the case of State ex rel. The Bank of America v. Rowe, filed July 19th, 1928, and it is so ordered.

Dismissed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Hazen v. Smith, 120 So. 334, 97 Fla. 249 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

120 So. 334 (Hazen v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.