Hazen v. Hazen

476 So. 2d 798, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 1985·No. No. 85-797·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dissolution which involved neither alimony nor equitable distribution. In view of the husband’s net worth ($118,000) and his anticipated annual income ($14,000-$15,000) as compared to the wife’s net worth (negative balance) and her anticipated annual income ($12,000), we hold that the court abused its discretion in awarding the wife child support of only $40 per week. See Kozelski v. Kozelski, 448 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Johnson v. Johnson, 367 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We direct that the court reconsider this figure and order child support in an amount not less than $65 per week. Since the wife had no money for attorney’s fees, we also direct that the court order the husband to pay her attorney a reasonable fee. See Peters v. Peters, 366 So.2d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We affirm the judgment in all other respects.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazen v. Hazen, 476 So. 2d 798, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

476 So. 2d 798 (Hazen v. Hazen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kozelski v. Kozelski
448 So. 2d 1228 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Johnson v. Johnson
367 So. 2d 695 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Peters v. Peters
366 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)