Hazelwood v. Robe

1920 OK 306, 192 P. 566, 79 Okla. 214, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 73
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 14, 1920·No. 11418·Published

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

The defendant in error has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein taken. There is no response filed.

In the petition in error it is not assigned as error that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for new trial.

The plaintiffs in error complain of error on the part of the trial court occurring during the progress of the .trial.

In Nichols v. Dexter, 52 Okla. 152, 152 Pac. 817, it is stated:

“Where the overruling of the motion for a new trial is not assigned as error in the petition in error, errors alleged to (have occurred during the trial are not properly presented, and cannot be reviewed.”

The appeal is dismissed.

RAINEY, O. J., and HARRISON, KANE, PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hazelwood v. Robe, 1920 OK 306, 192 P. 566, 79 Okla. 214, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 73 (Okla. 1920).

1920 OK 306 (Hazelwood v. Robe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Dexter
1915 OK 848 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)