Hazelwood v. Bautista

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hazelwood v. Bautista

683 So. 2d 1164, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241, 1996 WL 724195

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1283

StatusPublished

This text of 683 So. 2d 1164 (Hazelwood v. Bautista) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazelwood v. Bautista, 683 So. 2d 1164, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241, 1996 WL 724195 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part and remand for the trial court to enter an amended order limiting Appellant’s obligation for future medical and dental expenses by inserting appropriate words of limitation. E.g., Armstrong v. Armstrong, 623 So.2d 1216, 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. Canakaris v. Cana-karis, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse in part and remand for the trial court to enter an amended order limiting Appellant’s obligation for future medical and dental expenses by inserting appropriate words of limitation. E.g., Armstrong v. Armstrong, 623 So.2d 1216, 1219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. Canakaris v. Cana-karis, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).

STONE, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

683 So. 2d 1164, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13241, 1996 WL 724195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazelwood-v-bautista-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack