Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.

37 Ill. App. 310, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 180

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedNovember 11, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 Ill. App. 310 (Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazelton Boiler Co. v. Hazelton Tripod Boiler Co., 37 Ill. App. 310, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 180 (Ill. Ct. App. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Gary, J.

This is a bill by the appellant, a New York corporation, the principal object of which is to prevent the principal appellees, an Illinois corporation, from using the name “Hazelton” even as part of the corporate name, “The Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company,” in the business of making and selling boilers. The right so to use that name is a part of the franchise granted to the appellees by this State. If it is to be taken from them, it must be by some court having jurisdiction of a case where a franchise is involved, a jurisdiction which the Appellate Courts of this State do not possess. Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Co., 37 Ill. App. 133.

The appeal must-be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gary, J.

This is a bill by the appellant, a New York corporation, the principal object of which is to prevent the principal appellees, an Illinois corporation, from using the name “Hazelton” even as part of the corporate name, “The Hazelton Tripod Boiler Company,” in the business of making and selling boilers. The right so to use that name is a part of the franchise granted to the appellees by this State. If it is to be taken from them, it must be by some court having jurisdiction of a case where a franchise is involved, a jurisdiction which the Appellate Courts of this State do not possess. Bushnell v. Consolidated Ice Co., 37 Ill. App. 133.

The appeal must-be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 Ill. App. 310, 1890 Ill. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazelton-boiler-co-v-hazelton-tripod-boiler-co-illappct-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack