Hazeltine v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hazeltine v. State

1929 OK CR 370, 280 P. 1115, 44 Okla. Crim. 355, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 21, 1929

DocketNo. A-6748.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 370 (Hazeltine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazeltine v. State, 1929 OK CR 370, 280 P. 1115, 44 Okla. Crim. 355, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Caddo county, and his punishment fixed at 2% years in the state penitentiary. The appeal in this case was filed on the 8th day of September, 1927.

No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument. Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of a substantial right.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court of Caddo county, and his punishment fixed at 2% years in the state penitentiary. The appeal in this case was filed on the 8th day of September, 1927.

No briefs have been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error and no appearance was made for oral argument. Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of a substantial right.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 370, 280 P. 1115, 44 Okla. Crim. 355, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazeltine-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.