Hazelrig v. Hazelrig

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hazelrig v. Hazelrig

248 S.E.2d 157, 242 Ga. 75, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1098

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 6, 1978

Docket33759

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 S.E.2d 157 (Hazelrig v. Hazelrig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazelrig v. Hazelrig, 248 S.E.2d 157, 242 Ga. 75, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1098 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant husband in a divorce, alimony and child custody case. The appellant enumerates seven errors, but the brief filed contains only a statement of facts as to what transpired in the trial court. Therefore, the alleged errors are deemed abandoned under Rule 18(c) (2) of this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted June 23, 1978 Decided September 6, 1978. James R. Venable, for appellant. James B. Malcolm, Jr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nichols, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant husband in a divorce, alimony and child custody case. The appellant enumerates seven errors, but the brief filed contains only a statement of facts as to what transpired in the trial court. Therefore, the alleged errors are deemed abandoned under Rule 18(c) (2) of this court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted June 23, 1978 Decided September 6, 1978. James R. Venable, for appellant. James B. Malcolm, Jr., for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.E.2d 157, 242 Ga. 75, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazelrig-v-hazelrig-ga-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack