Hazel v. Lappin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6202
BOBBY HAZEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, United States Bureau of Prisons; JOE DRIVER; CAPTAIN BOYLES, Administrator; JORGES VAZQUEZ, Doctor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00070-REM)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Hazel, Appellant Pro Se. Rita R. Valdrini, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Bobby Hazel appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Hazel v. Lappin, No. 2:09-cv-00070-REM (N.D.W. Va.
Jan. 6, 2010). We deny Hazel’s motion for a stay. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hazel v. Lappin (Hazel v. Lappin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.