Hazel v. Cross

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 22, 2009
Docket09-7436
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hazel v. Cross (Hazel v. Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hazel v. Cross, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7436

BOBBY E. HAZEL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JAMES N. CROSS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00004-IMK)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby E. Hazel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bobby Hazel, a federal inmate, appeals the district

court’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s

recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006)

habeas corpus petition and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district

court. See Hazel v. Cross, No. 1:09-cv-00004-IMK (N.D.W. Va.

July 2, 2009; July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hazel v. Cross, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazel-v-cross-ca4-2009.