Hazel v. Cross

Fourth Circuit

Hazel v. Cross

334 F. App'x 546

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2009·No. No. 09-7436·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Hazel, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) habeas corpus petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Hazel v. Cross, No. 1:09-cv-00004-IMK, 2009 WL 1921185 (N.D.W. Va. July 2, 2009); 2009 WL 2176041 (July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because [547] the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Hazel, a federal inmate, appeals the district court’s orders and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) habeas corpus petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Hazel v. Cross, No. 1:09-cv-00004-IMK, 2009 WL 1921185 (N.D.W. Va. July 2, 2009); 2009 WL 2176041 (July 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because [547] the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hazel v. Cross, 334 F. App'x 546 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 546 (Hazel v. Cross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related