Hazel v. Cacy

Superior Court of Delaware

Hazel v. Cacy

63 A. 196, 21 Del. 360, 5 Penne. 360, 1905 Del. LEXIS 24

DecidedMay 10, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A. 196 (Hazel v. Cacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hazel v. Cacy, 63 A. 196, 21 Del. 360, 5 Penne. 360, 1905 Del. LEXIS 24 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

—We overrule that exception.

Mr. Cooper: My second exception is,—

That the record does not set forth what the notices contained or stated.

Revised Code 759, Sec. 33.

Mr. Wolcott: The question raised by the second exception has been passed upon by this Court in the case of Jump vs. Jones, 3 Pennewill, 163 (164).

The case of Jump vs. Jones seems to be conclusive upon the last exception. Let the judgment below be affirmed, on the ground of stare decisis.

Judgment below affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI