Hazel M. Meerdink v. Irma Ott v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
This text of 323 F.2d 366 (Hazel M. Meerdink v. Irma Ott v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
323 F.2d 366
Hazel M. MEERDINK
v.
Irma OTT
v.
The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant.
No. 14364.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued September 26, 1963.
Decided October 18, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Joseph P. Willson, Judge.
See also 3 Cir., 307 F.2d 721.
John A. Spaeder, Erie, Pa. (Marsh, Spaeder, Baur, Spaeder & Schaaf, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
John M. Feeney, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Thomas L. Cooper, McArdle, Harrington & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record and have weighed the arguments of counsel for the respective parties. We can perceive no error in the proceedings in the court below and we find the appeal lacking in merit. The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 F.2d 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hazel-m-meerdink-v-irma-ott-v-the-aetna-casualty-s-ca3-1963.