Hazel Dolores Vera v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00158-CR
Hazel Dolores VERA, Appellant
v. The STATE of The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR7719W Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2013
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant Hazel Dolores Vera pled nolo contendere to possession of less than one gram
of cocaine. On September 20, 2012, Appellant’s adjudication of guilt was deferred and she was
placed on community supervision. On February 19, 2013, the trial court amended Appellant’s
conditions of community supervision. Appellant seeks to appeal from the trial court’s order
modifying the conditions of her deferred adjudication.
On May 1, 2013, we notified Appellant that “an order modifying the terms or conditions
of deferred adjudication is not in itself appealable.” Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. 04-13-00158-CR
Crim. App. 2006); see Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977). We ordered
Appellant to show cause in writing why her appeal should not be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction.
In her May 2, 2013 response to our May 1, 2013 order, Appellant’s counsel agreed that
this court lacks jurisdiction to hear Appellant’s appeal. Because the order modifying the terms of
Appellant’s deferred adjudication is not an appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See Davis, 195 S.W.3d at 711; Basaldua, 558 S.W.2d at 5.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hazel Dolores Vera v. State (Hazel Dolores Vera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.