Haywood v. Thayer

New York Supreme Court

Haywood v. Thayer

10 Wend. 571

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1833

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Wend. 571 (Haywood v. Thayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haywood v. Thayer, 10 Wend. 571 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).

Pincite

Opinion

The objection was sustained by the court, Mr. Justice Sutherland remarking that here the time to plead was enlarged 28 days without any reason whatever shewn for it; that commissioners ought to confine parties to the shortest possible time for pleading, when applied to for an enlargement of the rule to plead ; and where the effect of such enlargement will probably be a loss of trial, unless short notice of trial be accepted, they should impose the acceptance of such notice as a condition.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The objection was sustained by the court, Mr. Justice Sutherland remarking that here the time to plead was enlarged 28 days without any reason whatever shewn for it; that commissioners ought to confine parties to the shortest possible time for pleading, when applied to for an enlargement of the rule to plead ; and where the effect of such enlargement will probably be a loss of trial, unless short notice of trial be accepted, they should impose the acceptance of such notice as a condition.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Wend. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haywood-v-thayer-nysupct-1833.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack