Haywood v. Thayer
10 Wend. 571
Opinion
The objection was sustained by the court, Mr. Justice Sutherland remarking that here the time to plead was enlarged 28 days without any reason whatever shewn for it; that commissioners ought to confine parties to the shortest possible time for pleading, when applied to for an enlargement of the rule to plead ; and where the effect of such enlargement will probably be a loss of trial, unless short notice of trial be accepted, they should impose the acceptance of such notice as a condition.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haywood v. Thayer, 10 Wend. 571 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1833).
10 Wend. 571 (Haywood v. Thayer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States ex rel. Smith v. District Court
1 Pin. 569 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1845)
Killbourne v. Fairchild
12 Wend. 293 (New York Supreme Court, 1835)