Haywood v. State
615 So. 2d 707, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1992 WL 368458
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 11, 1992·No. No. 92-02737·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed. He argues that he had previously filed a motion for postconviction relief that was dismissed without prejudice by the trial court. Apparently, the motion on review here was the resubmission of that motion. If correct, the court erred in denying the motion as untimely filed. See Lemus v. State, 585 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, since the appellant’s postconviction relief motion fails on its merits, we affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haywood v. State, 615 So. 2d 707, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1992 WL 368458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
615 So. 2d 707 (Haywood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
618 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Miller v. State
617 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Armesto v. Weidner
615 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)