Haywood v. State

615 So. 2d 707, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1992 WL 368458
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1992
DocketNo. 92-02737
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 615 So. 2d 707 (Haywood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haywood v. State, 615 So. 2d 707, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1992 WL 368458 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for postconviction relief as untimely filed. He argues that he had previously filed a motion for postconviction relief that was dismissed without prejudice by the trial court. Apparently, the motion on review here was the resubmission of that motion. If correct, the court erred in denying the motion as untimely filed. See Lemus v. State, 585 So.2d 388 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, since the appellant’s postconviction relief motion fails on its merits, we affirm.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
618 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Miller v. State
617 So. 2d 332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Armesto v. Weidner
615 So. 2d 707 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
615 So. 2d 707, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12420, 1992 WL 368458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haywood-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.