Haywood v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haywood v. State

218 So. 2d 242, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6252

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1969

DocketNo. 68-395

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 218 So. 2d 242 (Haywood v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haywood v. State, 218 So. 2d 242, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6252 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

Appellant contends that his petition under Rule 1.850, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., was [243]*243erroneously denied without an evidentiary hearing. The petition alleges improper reception of a guilty plea. The record indicates that the trial judge asked a long and appropriate series of questions the answers to which indicate clearly that the appellant knowingly and intelligently entered a plea of guilty.

Oral argument is dispensed with as serving no useful purpose pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI