Haywood v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Haywood v. State

106 So. 918, 21 Ala. App. 675

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1926·No. 7 Div. 153.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant and another were charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law, by having possession of whisky. The prosecution originated in the county court, and upon arraignment the defendants demanded a trial by jury and executed an appearance bond to the circuit court. From a judgment of conviction of this appellant in the circuit court, this appeal, which is upon the record only, was taken. The proceedings as disclosed by the record appear to be regular in all things. No error appearing, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant and another were charged with the offense of violating the prohibition law, by having possession of whisky. The prosecution originated in the county court, and upon arraignment the defendants demanded a trial by jury and executed an appearance bond to the circuit court. From a judgment of conviction of this appellant in the circuit court, this appeal, which is upon the record only, was taken. The proceedings as disclosed by the record appear to be regular in all things. No error appearing, the judgment of conviction appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Haywood v. State, 106 So. 918, 21 Ala. App. 675 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

106 So. 918 (Haywood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.