Haywood v. . Bryan and Sugg

63 N.C. 521
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1869·Published

Opinion

Reade, J.

When any pleading is verified, every subsequent pleading, except a demurrer, must be verified also. C. C. P. §116.

The defendant shall appear, and demur, plead or answer, at the term to which the summons shall be returnable; otherwise the plaintiff may have judgment by default, as is now allowed by law: Act to suspend the Code in certain cases, March 16th 1869.

It is admitted by the defendant, that if he had answered, he would have been obliged to verify the answer, under the Code, § 116; but he says that under the Act of March 16th 1869, he is permitted to defend by “plea,” instead of by “answer” asi provided in the Code, and that a plea need not be verified.

We doubt whether “plead” in the act of March 16th 1869' means anything more than the common defence by “answer”' in the Code; but if it does, it still requires to be verified, for a plea as well as an answer, is a part of the pleadings; and when the complaint is verified, all the other “pleadings” must, be verified also. There is no error. Judgment here for plaintiff.

PER Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haywood v. . Bryan and Sugg, 63 N.C. 521 (N.C. 1869).

63 N.C. 521 (Haywood v. . Bryan and Sugg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.