Haywood & Son v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Iowa

Haywood & Son v. O'Brien

3 N.W. 545, 52 Iowa 537

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided December 8, 1879·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Seevers, J.

i. landlord assignment’of mend — It was held in Lufkin da Wilson v. Preston,. cmte, page 235, that leases like the one in question were-assignable, and that the assignee was entitled thereunder to the rent. This being true, we think it follows that the assignee is entitled to a writ. [538]*538of attachment, as provided by statute. The assignment of the lease carried with it the lien of the lessor, and all the remedies for its enforcement.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seevers, J.

i. landlord assignment’of mend — It was held in Lufkin da Wilson v. Preston,. cmte, page 235, that leases like the one in question were-assignable, and that the assignee was entitled thereunder to the rent. This being true, we think it follows that the assignee is entitled to a writ. [538]*538of attachment, as provided by statute. The assignment of the lease carried with it the lien of the lessor, and all the remedies for its enforcement.

Affirmed.

Haywood & Son v. O'Brien, 3 N.W. 545, 52 Iowa 537 (iowa 1879).

Pincite

3 N.W. 545 (Haywood & Son v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related