Hayward v. Passaic National Bank Trust Co.
199 A. 46, 123 N.J. Eq. 592, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 688
Opinion
We deem it sufficient to say that, while not adopting the opinion, we are in accord with the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor; and the decree is accordingly affirmed.
For affirmance — PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None. *Page 593
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayward v. Passaic National Bank Trust Co., 199 A. 46, 123 N.J. Eq. 592, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 688 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).
199 A. 46 (Hayward v. Passaic National Bank Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.