Hayward v. . Conkling

96 N.Y. 664, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 585
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 96 N.Y. 664 (Hayward v. . Conkling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayward v. . Conkling, 96 N.Y. 664, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 585 (N.Y. 1884).

Opinion

Agree to affirm order, and for judgment absolute against plaintiff on stipulation; no opinion.

All concur, except Bugeb, Oh. J., and Bapallo, J., dissenting.

Order affirmed, and judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.Y. 664, 1884 N.Y. LEXIS 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayward-v-conkling-ny-1884.