Hayward v. Auditor General
111 N.W. 190, 147 Mich. 591, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 957
Opinions
I am of the opinion that there is no statutory impediment to cancellation by the auditor general of a deed or sale by the State after notice and the expiration of the period of six months referred to therein (see Jakobowski v. Auditor General, 144 Mich. 46; Shaaf v. O’Connor, 146 Mich. 504), and that relator’s laches, if the delay may be so called, under the circumstances, should not preclude the granting of his application to the auditor general.
The writ should issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayward v. Auditor General, 111 N.W. 190, 147 Mich. 591, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 957 (Mich. 1907).
111 N.W. 190 (Hayward v. Auditor General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fitschen v. Olson
119 N.W. 3 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)