Hayward v. Auditor General
This text of 111 N.W. 190 (Hayward v. Auditor General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
I am of the opinion that there is no statutory impediment to cancellation by the auditor general of a deed or sale by the State after notice and the expiration of the period of six months referred to therein (see Jakobowski v. Auditor General, 144 Mich. 46; Shaaf v. O’Connor, 146 Mich. 504), and that relator’s laches, if the delay may be so called, under the circumstances, should not preclude the granting of his application to the auditor general.
The writ should issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 N.W. 190, 147 Mich. 591, 1907 Mich. LEXIS 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayward-v-auditor-general-mich-1907.