Hayton v. State

256 S.W.2d 853, 158 Tex. Crim. 455, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1651
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1953·No. No. 26,377·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.00.

The statement of facts is approved by appellant’s counsel only. This is not sufficient. Article 759a, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P.

If the instrument appearing in the record signed by the trial judge and the county attorney may be considered as an approval of the statement of facts, such approval was long after the 90 days allowed for filing the statement of facts and cannot be considered.

No formal bills of exception appear in the record.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayton v. State, 256 S.W.2d 853, 158 Tex. Crim. 455, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1651 (Tex. 1953).

256 S.W.2d 853 (Hayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ellis v. State
265 S.W.2d 113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)