Hayton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hayton v. State

256 S.W.2d 853, 158 Tex. Crim. 455, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1651

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 15, 1953

DocketNo. 26,377

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 S.W.2d 853 (Hayton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayton v. State, 256 S.W.2d 853, 158 Tex. Crim. 455, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1651 (Tex. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50.00.

The statement of facts is approved by appellant’s counsel only. This is not sufficient. Article 759a, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P.

If the instrument appearing in the record signed by the trial judge and the county attorney may be considered as an approval of the statement of facts, such approval was long after the 90 days allowed for filing the statement of facts and cannot be considered.

No formal bills of exception appear in the record.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI