Hays v. Walker
77 So. 930, 16 Ala. App. 336, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 19
This text of 77 So. 930 (Hays v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hays v. Walker, 77 So. 930, 16 Ala. App. 336, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 19 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
There are no assignments of error, and under the rule and tire decisions, no error can be considered, except one of jurisdiction. The trial court had jurisdiction, and the judgment is -affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Benich v. Stewart
36 So. 2d 599 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Loveland v. Scarborough
107 So. 926 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
77 So. 930, 16 Ala. App. 336, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hays-v-walker-alactapp-1918.