Hays v. Walker

77 So. 930, 16 Ala. App. 336, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 19
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1918·No. 5 Div. 265.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SAMPORD, J.

There are no assignments of error, and under the rule and tire decisions, no error can be considered, except one of jurisdiction. The trial court had jurisdiction, and the judgment is -affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hays v. Walker, 77 So. 930, 16 Ala. App. 336, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 19 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

77 So. 930 (Hays v. Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benich v. Stewart
36 So. 2d 599 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Loveland v. Scarborough
107 So. 926 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1926)