Hays v. State

28 S.W. 203, 33 Tex. Crim. 546, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 20, 1894
DocketNo. 837.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 28 S.W. 203 (Hays v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hays v. State, 28 S.W. 203, 33 Tex. Crim. 546, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161 (Tex. 1894).

Opinion

• DAVIDSON, Judge.

The charge contained in the information was .aggravated assault. The verdict reads as follows, to wit: “We the jury find the defendant guilty, and assess his fine at $10.” It is contended the verdict is too indefinite and uncertain to form the basis of .a judgment. We are of opinion the contention is correct. Where •the offense charged consists of degrees, the jury should at least state -in their verdict the degree of which they find the accused guilty. Aggravated assaults include simple assaults. The fine for aggravated assault can not be less than $25, and the punishment for simple assault *547 can not exceed that amount. The fine in this is $10. The verdict does not in terms acquit of the higher, nor does it specify the less, offense. There was no charge given the jury, nor is there a statement of the facts found in the record. If presumptions be indulged, it would be held that the conviction was for the offense stated in the pleadings. The fine, in this view of the case, would be illegal.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lloyd
139 N.W. 514 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1913)
Scott v. State
131 S.W. 1072 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Evans v. State
122 S.W. 392 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Bryant v. State
111 S.W. 1009 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Moody v. State
105 S.W. 1127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1907)
State v. Woodrow
52 S.E. 545 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)
Winzel v. State
83 S.W. 187 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1904)
McLane v. Territory
71 P. 938 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1903)
Lee v. State
55 S.W. 814 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.W. 203, 33 Tex. Crim. 546, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hays-v-state-texcrimapp-1894.