Hays v. State

127 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 637
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1930·No. 4 Div. 554.·Published

Opinion

*638 RICE, J.

In the first place, the conviction of this appellant rests upon very unsatisfactory evidence. Whether wholly insufficient to sustain the judgment of -conviction we need not decide now, since', upon the authority of the decision and opinion of this court in the case of Graven v. State, 18 Ala. App. 48, 88 So. 457, and later decisions in line therewith, it is clear that appellant’s motion to set aside the verdict of the jury, and the 'judgment rendered thereon, should have been granted anyhow. For the error in overruling it, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hays v. State, 127 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 637 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

127 So. 921 (Hays v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craven v. State
88 So. 457 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)