Hays v. Simmons
59 P. 182, 6 Idaho 651, 1899 Ida. LEXIS 53
Opinion
— The principal contention upon which appel-ants seek a reversal is that the appellants were not prosecuted by indictment or information filed by the public prosecutor. This contention and all the other points raised by appellants in this appeal were considered and passed upon by this court in the ease of Rankin v. Jauman, 4 Idaho, 53, 394, 36 Pac. 503, and 39 Pac. 1111. Upon authority of those cases the judgment of the district court in this case is affirmed, with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hays v. Simmons, 59 P. 182, 6 Idaho 651, 1899 Ida. LEXIS 53 (Idaho 1899).
59 P. 182 (Hays v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Archbold v. Huntington
201 P. 1041 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
State v. Borstad
147 N.W. 380 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1914)
Corker v. Pence
85 P. 388 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1906)
Ponting v. Isaman
62 P. 680 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1900)
Hays v. Young
59 P. 1113 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1899)