Hays v. Sack

25 Ind. 170
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1865
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Ind. 170 (Hays v. Sack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hays v. Sack, 25 Ind. 170 (Ind. 1865).

Opinion

Frazer, C. J.

A reversal is claimed in this case sdlely upon the ground that the verdict is against the evidence. The cause has been submitted to four juries, resulting in one failure to agree and three verdicts for the appellee. The first, [171]*171for $18 85, the second, for $15, and the third, for $32 30. The cause originated before a justice.

W. W. Lilly, for appellant. S. Green, for appellee.

In view of the foregoing history, it is difficult to believe that we are expected to set aside the verdict. There was the evidence of one witness, the plaintiff himself, which, if true, fully supported the finding. He was directly contradicted by the oath of the defendant, and the testimony of the latter was somewhat corroborated, while that of the former was not. The case turned, however, upon the credit to be given to witnesses. We can very rarely,, if ever, undertake to pass upon that question, and certainly not in a case like this. It is peculiarly a question for a jury-

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ind. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hays-v-sack-ind-1865.