Hays v. Johns

42 Ind. 505
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Worden, J.

In this case there is no assignment of errors “ on the transcript,” as required by the statute. 2 G. & H. 275, sec. 568. There is among the papers filed in the cause what purports to be an abstract of the record, and on this paper there is an assignment of error. It was clearly intended that errors should be assigned, in the language of the statute, “ on the transcript,” and not on loose and detached pieces of paper. A motion which the appellee has filed to dismiss the appeal for the want of a proper assignment of error must be sustained.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hays v. Johns, 42 Ind. 505 (Ind. 1873).

42 Ind. 505 (Hays v. Johns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baur v. Lee
10 N.E.2d 444 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1937)
Smith, Admr. v. Cedan
184 N.E. 426 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1933)
Huber v. Tielking
103 N.E. 853 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1914)
Deputy v. Hill
85 Ind. 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)