Hays v. Barlow
54 So. 2, 98 Miss. 487
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
On this record appellee has the right to demand that appellant shall exhaust the non-exempt property before resorting to the exempt property. 12 A. and E. Ency. Law, 212; 18 Cyc. 1461, note 11; Hodges v. Hickey, 67 Miss. 715, 7 South. 404; Koen v. Brill, 75 Miss. 870, 23 South. 481, 65 Am. St. Rep. 633; Miller v. McCarty, 47 Minn. 321, 50 N. W. 235, 28 Am. St. Rep. 375.
Affirmed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hays v. Barlow, 54 So. 2, 98 Miss. 487 (Mich. 1910).
54 So. 2 (Hays v. Barlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heyman v. Gordon
190 A.2d 670 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1963)
Wimberly v. Paterson
183 A.2d 691 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Heagen v. Borough of Allendale
127 A.2d 181 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Martin v. Cestone
110 A.2d 54 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Dogan, Sheriff v. Cooley
185 So. 783 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1939)