Haynie v. Watson

70 Ga. 707
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 20, 1883·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Jackson, Chief Justice.

This is the first grant of a new trial. In such a case the action of the judge is never closely scanned, and, unless the verdict be demanded, that action granting the new trial is always affirmed. It is not demanded in this case.

The judgment which sought to subject the land was hardly rendered on a note for purchase money; at least we shall not interfere with the court below, who wishes to review his ruling on the law of the case as applied to the facts reported above. See 65 Ga., 177; 60 Ib., 456; 40 Ib., 423, 428. If the consideration of the note was not purchase money, of course the claimant’s homestead should have prevailed over the judgment on that note.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynie v. Watson, 70 Ga. 707 (Ga. 1883).

70 Ga. 707 (Haynie v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsend v. Rechsteiner
24 S.E.2d 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Brenner v. Wright
2 S.E.2d 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)