Haynie v. Warden

152 A.2d 806, 220 Md. 660, 1959 Md. LEXIS 561
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJuly 6, 1959
DocketP. C. No. 4
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 A.2d 806 (Haynie v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynie v. Warden, 152 A.2d 806, 220 Md. 660, 1959 Md. LEXIS 561 (Md. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge John T. Tucker in the Criminal Court of Baltimore for the denial of Haynie’s petition.

One contention relating to the reason why Haynie did not appeal from his conviction, which was raised in the Criminal Court of Baltimore by what seems to have been a supplemental petition (called by the petitioner a “cross-bill”) filed in response to the State’s answer, appears to have been abandoned there and to be refuted by the applicant’s brief in this Court. It, therefore, calls for no discussion.

Any additional claims not made before the Criminal Court of Baltimore which the applicant has included in his brief in support of this application are not properly before us. Davis v. Warden, 217 Md. 662, 143 A. 2d 77 (an application for leave to appeal in a habeas corpus case).

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lloyd v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
229 F. Supp. 364 (D. Maryland, 1964)
Rudolph v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
217 F. Supp. 579 (D. Maryland, 1963)
Brown v. Director of Patuxent Institution
165 A.2d 895 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.2d 806, 220 Md. 660, 1959 Md. LEXIS 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynie-v-warden-md-1959.