Haynie v. State

658 S.W.2d 407, 280 Ark. 440, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1530
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 17, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 658 S.W.2d 407 (Haynie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynie v. State, 658 S.W.2d 407, 280 Ark. 440, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1530 (Ark. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner seeks a belated appeal pursuant to A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.9. On March 28, 1983, she was found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to forty years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Petitioner acknowledges that she was advised of her rights to appeal and failed to express any desire to appeal within the time allowed, which she attributes to her own disorientation and confusion and to a low level of intelligence. Petitioner’s allegations are wholly conclusory and fail to establish good cause as required by the rule. The petition is without merit and is, accordingly, denied.

Purtle, J., would grant rehearing. Justice Purtle’s dissenting opinion on denial of rehearing appears in 281 Ark. at page 98.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
658 S.W.2d 407, 280 Ark. 440, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynie-v-state-ark-1983.