Haynie v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Haynie v. State

35 So. 2d 573, 33 Ala. App. 581

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 1948·No. 8 Div. 669.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding in bastardy. In such cases, on appeal it is incumbent upon the appellant to not oqly assign erroi'S, as in civil cases, but also such assignments should be insisted upon. In the absence of such insistence the alleged assignments are deemed to have been waived. This is the settled rule. No compliance with said rxxle appears in this case, and therefore no question is presented to this court for review.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Oliver v. State, 31 Ala.App. 146, 13 So.2d 891; certiorari denied 244 Ala. 475, 13 So.2d 893; Brantley v. State, 11 Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding in bastardy. In such cases, on appeal it is incumbent upon the appellant to not oqly assign erroi'S, as in civil cases, but also such assignments should be insisted upon. In the absence of such insistence the alleged assignments are deemed to have been waived. This is the settled rule. No compliance with said rxxle appears in this case, and therefore no question is presented to this court for review.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Oliver v. State, 31 Ala.App. 146, 13 So.2d 891; certiorari denied 244 Ala. 475, 13 So.2d 893; Brantley v. State, 11 Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678.

Affirmed.

Haynie v. State, 35 So. 2d 573, 33 Ala. App. 581 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

35 So. 2d 573 (Haynie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related