Haynie v. State

35 So. 2d 573, 33 Ala. App. 581
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 25, 1948
Docket8 Div. 669.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 So. 2d 573 (Haynie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynie v. State, 35 So. 2d 573, 33 Ala. App. 581 (Ala. Ct. App. 1948).

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is a proceeding in bastardy. In such cases, on appeal it is incumbent upon the appellant to not oqly assign erroi'S, as in civil cases, but also such assignments should be insisted upon. In the absence of such insistence the alleged assignments are deemed to have been waived. This is the settled rule. No compliance with said rxxle appears in this case, and therefore no question is presented to this court for review.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed. Oliver v. State, 31 Ala.App. 146, 13 So.2d 891; certiorari denied 244 Ala. 475, 13 So.2d 893; Brantley v. State, 11 Ala.App. 144, 65 So. 678.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kevin Scott v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998
Brown v. State
53 So. 2d 633 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 So. 2d 573, 33 Ala. App. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynie-v-state-alactapp-1948.