Haynie v. Southern Railway Co.
206 N.C. 203
This text of 206 N.C. 203 (Haynie v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haynie v. Southern Railway Co., 206 N.C. 203 (N.C. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment of nonsuit is sustained by the following authorities: Tart v. R. R., 202 N. C., 52; Foard v. Power Co., 170 N. C., 48; Baker v. R. R., 150 N. C., 562; Meredith v. R. R., 108 N. C., 616.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.
161 S.E. 720 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1932)
Foard Ex Rel. Foard v. Tidewater Power Co.
86 S.E. 804 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1915)
Baker v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
64 S.E. 506 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1909)
Meredith v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
13 S.E. 137 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
206 N.C. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynie-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1934.