Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Alphonso Haynesworth appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, 1986 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haynesworth v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 8:08-cv-01841-PMD, 2009 WL 3233470 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
367 F. App'x 408 (Haynesworth v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.