Haynes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Haynes v. State

113 S.W.2d 916

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haynes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 Tex. Crim. 52 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 16, 1938·No. No. 19485·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder without malice aforethought, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Hence, the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the indictment to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.

An examination of the indictment discloses that it is in due form» and sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder without malice aforethought, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the state penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. Hence, the only matter presented for review is the sufficiency of the indictment to charge the offense of which appellant was convicted.

An examination of the indictment discloses that it is in due form» and sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Haynes v. State, 113 S.W.2d 916 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

113 S.W.2d 916 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.