Haynes v. State Road Commission

7 Ct. Cl. 208
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedJanuary 27, 1969
DocketNo. D-18
StatusPublished

This text of 7 Ct. Cl. 208 (Haynes v. State Road Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynes v. State Road Commission, 7 Ct. Cl. 208 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1969).

Opinion

Jones, Judge:

This claim is for extra cost incurred in pre-drilling for steel piles to support a bridge over Interstate Route No. 64 near White Sulphur Springs. The fill work in the bridge area had been performed by another contractor and it appears that isolated argillaceous limestone material unintentionally was incorporated in the fill limits of the bridge which caused drilling difficulty not contemplated by the claimant or the State Road Commission at the time the contract was entered into. This work was performed in 1966; and the total amount claimed is $7,053.59. Engineers for the State Road Commission admitted the accuracy of the actual cost analysis of the claimant, but, based on experience and camparisons with similar projects, the State Road Commission contended that if a heavier rig and drill had been used, the delay and extra cost could have been substantially reduced.

By stipulation, duly filed herein, the parties hereto have agreed that the claimant is entitled to additional compensation based on calculations made by the State Road Commission engineers.

The Court is of opinion to accept and approve said stipulation, and accordingly, an award is made to the claimant, J. C. Haynes, in the sum of $4,033.76.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ct. Cl. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-state-road-commission-wvctcl-1969.