Haynes v. State

211 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 25, 2007 WL 43679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haynes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 555
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 2007·No. WD 66574·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lankford Haynes (Haynes) appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. State, 211 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 25, 2007 WL 43679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

211 S.W.3d 149 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Haynes
158 S.W.3d 918 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Garas v. Kelly Services, Inc.
211 S.W.3d 149 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)