Haynes v. State

211 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 25, 2007 WL 43679
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 2007
DocketWD 66574
StatusPublished

This text of 211 S.W.3d 149 (Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynes v. State, 211 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 25, 2007 WL 43679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Lankford Haynes (Haynes) appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion to vacate the judgment and sentence under Rule 29.15. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Haynes
158 S.W.3d 918 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Garas v. Kelly Services, Inc.
211 S.W.3d 149 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 S.W.3d 149, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 25, 2007 WL 43679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-state-moctapp-2007.