Haynes v. State

140 So. 3d 686, 2014 WL 2589193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 2014
DocketNo. 1D14-1398
StatusPublished

This text of 140 So. 3d 686 (Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynes v. State, 140 So. 3d 686, 2014 WL 2589193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By a petition to invoke the all writs jurisdiction of this court, petitioner seeks to challenge his judgment and sentence in Alachua County Circuit court case number 01-2006-CF-000815-A. The petition is dismissed. See Williams v. State, 918 So.2d 541 (Fla.2005) (stating that the all writs provision of article V, section 3(b)(7), Florida Constitution, does not confer added appellate jurisdiction on the courts, and the court’s all writs power cannot be used as an independent basis of jurisdiction in the courts (citing St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla.1980))).

WOLF, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PAUL TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Davis
392 So. 2d 1304 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cormier v. Colston
918 So. 2d 541 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 So. 3d 686, 2014 WL 2589193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.