Haynes v. State

140 So. 3d 686, 2014 WL 2589193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haynes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 190
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 2014·No. No. 1D14-1398·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By a petition to invoke the all writs jurisdiction of this court, petitioner seeks to challenge his judgment and sentence in Alachua County Circuit court case number 01-2006-CF-000815-A. The petition is dismissed. See Williams v. State, 918 So.2d 541 (Fla.2005) (stating that the all writs provision of article V, section 3(b)(7), Florida Constitution, does not confer added appellate jurisdiction on the courts, and the court’s all writs power cannot be used as an independent basis of jurisdiction in the courts (citing St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla.1980))).

WOLF, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. State, 140 So. 3d 686, 2014 WL 2589193, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8845 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

140 So. 3d 686 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PAUL TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION v. Davis
392 So. 2d 1304 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cormier v. Colston
918 So. 2d 541 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)