Haynes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Haynes v. State

647 So. 2d 904, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11370, 1994 WL 655887

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 23, 1994

DocketNo. 93-2211

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 647 So. 2d 904 (Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. State, 647 So. 2d 904, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11370, 1994 WL 655887 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except one. The State concedes the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences for count I and count III. Therefore, sentences for count I and III should run concurrently.

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentences, except for the State’s concession of sentencing error and remand to the trial court.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., and BARR, ROBBIE M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI