Haynes v. State
491 So. 2d 622, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1658, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9079
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Haynes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 440 So. 2d 661 →
Opinion
We affirm the conviction and sentence, but reverse as to the costs imposed. The costs were imposed without following the dictates of Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984), and thus we reverse for a hearing on costs to be imposed on the appellant.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haynes v. State, 491 So. 2d 622, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1658, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9079 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
491 So. 2d 622 (Haynes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)