Haynes v. State
127 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 637
This text of 127 So. 921 (Haynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Haynes v. State, 127 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 637 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Defendant, was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and appeals.
Under the decision in Ex parte State ex rel., etc., Re Jinright v.' State, 220 Ala. 268, 125 So. 606, the amendment to the affidavit in this case was immaterial. Error cannot be predicated on this ruling.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Jinright v. State
125 So. 606 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 So. 921, 23 Ala. App. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-state-alactapp-1930.