Haynes v. Ledyard

Michigan Supreme Court

Haynes v. Ledyard

7 N.W. 236, 44 Mich. 621, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 650

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 N.W. 236 (Haynes v. Ledyard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. Ledyard, 7 N.W. 236, 44 Mich. 621, 1880 Mich. LEXIS 650 (Mich. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, J.

This case, which was before us at the January term, 1876, and reported in 33 Mich. 319, now comes up again on questions which we cannot distinguish from those before decided.

[622]*622The court below ruled in accordance with our decision as there reported that the instrument there set forth at length was not a chattel mortgage or any security of the same or similar character, and could not be made out as such by parol evidence ; but that whatever its nature, it could be shown to have been fraudulent.

As we have already so decided we do not think it proper to do more than affirm the judgment with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI