Haynes v. Haynes
279 A.D. 583, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3080
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant, however, was not entitled to any credit for alimony payments in a larger amount made by him prior to the entry of the order of modification; for that reason we reverse the second order and grant plaintiff’s motion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haynes v. Haynes, 279 A.D. 583, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 583 (Haynes v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Foley v. Foley
336 A.2d 549 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1975)