Haynes v. Franklin

744 N.E.2d 774, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1308
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 28, 2001
Docket00-2141
StatusPublished

This text of 744 N.E.2d 774 (Haynes v. Franklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haynes v. Franklin, 744 N.E.2d 774, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1308 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA2000-03-025. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry Granting In Part Motion to Certify Conflict filed November 13, 2000, at page 2:

“[WJhether an edge drop on the berm of a county or city road, in and of itself, constitutes a nuisance within the meaning of R.C. 2744.02(B)(3).”

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 00-2004, Haynes v. Franklin, Warren App. No. CA2000-03025.

The conflict case is Thompson v. Muskingum Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (Nov. 12, 1998), Muskingum App. No. CT98-0010, unreported, 1998 WL 817826.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
744 N.E.2d 774, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1477, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 1308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-franklin-ohio-2001.