Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office

Fourth Circuit

Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24858, 1995 WL 419185

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 14, 1995

Docket95-6598

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 822 (Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office, 60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24858, 1995 WL 419185 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John A. HAYNES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
DORCHESTER COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE; Dorchester County
Courthouse; Summerville Police Department; Melissa Dyches;
Norbert E. Cummings, Jr.; Unknown Informant, and/or other
participants, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

John A. Haynes, appellant pro se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC; Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office, No. CA-94-598-3-6-BC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

John A. HAYNES, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
DORCHESTER COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE; Dorchester County
Courthouse; Summerville Police Department; Melissa Dyches;
Norbert E. Cummings, Jr.; Unknown Informant, and/or other
participants, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6598.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

John A. Haynes, appellant pro se. Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC; Sandra J. Senn, Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Dorchester County Solicitor's Office, No. CA-94-598-3-6-BC (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24858, 1995 WL 419185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-dorchester-county-solicitors-office-ca4-1995.