Haynes v. Creighton

New York Supreme Court

Haynes v. Creighton

11 N.Y.S. 492, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 822, 58 Hun 604, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187

DecidedOctober 24, 1890

StatusPublished

This text of 11 N.Y.S. 492 (Haynes v. Creighton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. Creighton, 11 N.Y.S. 492, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 822, 58 Hun 604, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Daniels, J.

This action is upon anote for $2,000 made by the defendant, and indorsed by him. It is shown by the plaintiff’s affidavit, on which the order for the examination of the plaintiff has been made, to be one of the notes delivered by the defendant to A D. Jones to be delivered by him to Charles T. Russell, and diverted and misappropriated by Jones; and the order for the plaintiff’s examination is in the same form as that made in the other action by him against the defendant. ■ Ante, 490. The necessity for this examination to obtain information to frame the answer has'been shown the same as it was in the other action by the plaintiff against the defendant; and, for the reasons stated in that action, the order from which this appeal has been brought should he reversed, and the motion denied, without costs, with the disbursements on the appeal to the defendant. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels, J.

This action is upon anote for $2,000 made by the defendant, and indorsed by him. It is shown by the plaintiff’s affidavit, on which the order for the examination of the plaintiff has been made, to be one of the notes delivered by the defendant to A D. Jones to be delivered by him to Charles T. Russell, and diverted and misappropriated by Jones; and the order for the plaintiff’s examination is in the same form as that made in the other action by him against the defendant. ■ Ante, 490. The necessity for this examination to obtain information to frame the answer has'been shown the same as it was in the other action by the plaintiff against the defendant; and, for the reasons stated in that action, the order from which this appeal has been brought should he reversed, and the motion denied, without costs, with the disbursements on the appeal to the defendant. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 N.Y.S. 492, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 822, 58 Hun 604, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-creighton-nysupct-1890.