Haynes v. City of Middletown
3 A.3d 70, 298 Conn. 907, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 332
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 72 (AC 30964), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s setting aside the jury’s verdict because the plaintiffs failed to plead the imminent harm exception to municipal immunity in their reply?”
NORCOTT and EVELEIGH, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haynes v. City of Middletown, 3 A.3d 70, 298 Conn. 907, 2010 Conn. LEXIS 332 (Colo. 2010).
3 A.3d 70 (Haynes v. City of Middletown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haynes v. City of Middletown
66 A.3d 899 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)