Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers

1943 OK 189, 137 P.2d 573, 192 Okla. 494, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 18, 1943

DocketNo. 31030.

StatusPublished

This text of 1943 OK 189 (Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers, 1943 OK 189, 137 P.2d 573, 192 Okla. 494, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him, and on September 3, 1942, *495 duly filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him, and on September 3, 1942, *495 duly filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK 189, 137 P.2d 573, 192 Okla. 494, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haynes-v-board-of-trustees-of-town-of-antlers-okla-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack