Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers

1943 OK 189, 137 P.2d 573, 192 Okla. 494, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 18, 1943·No. No. 31030.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him, and on September 3, 1942, *495 duly filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers, 1943 OK 189, 137 P.2d 573, 192 Okla. 494, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215 (Okla. 1943).

1943 OK 189 (Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborne v. Osborne
1933 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)